Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Nano] Does nothing 2 (156285)
#11
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Casiru
Original posted-at text: 2005-06-07 20:43
Auno comment ID: 12987
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

And killed an ARK and was removed.
Reply
#12
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Faynt
Original posted-at text: 2005-07-19 20:00
Auno comment ID: 14171
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

>.< quality - ARK DIE!!
Reply
#13
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Cherenobog
Original posted-at text: 2005-08-10 08:27
Auno comment ID: 14825
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

THE ARK HAD IT COMMING I SAY >>; . . . . Greeter my ass.. HE WAS PACKING
Reply
#14
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: McYoda
Original posted-at text: 2005-08-11 02:25
Auno comment ID: 14850
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

:D we engis want more nerfing! How about removing our robots, too? They do too much damage :P
Reply
#15
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Techboy
Original posted-at text: 2005-08-19 21:30
Auno comment ID: 15192
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

More nerfing? dude removing *that* aint nerfing :p you havent saw it :P
Reply
#16
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Mystixx
Original posted-at text: 2005-09-01 12:05
Auno comment ID: 15705
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

Meh ARK killing is laugh
Reply
#17
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Arrone
Original posted-at text: 2005-10-31 03:09
Auno comment ID: 18324
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

lol yoda
Reply
#18
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Mechwarrior5
Original posted-at text: 2005-12-19 04:12
Auno comment ID: 21245
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

what i don't understand is why FC can't just fix this and give it to engis i mean they already suck enough with all these new pets. They've never really done as much for engineers then they have for mp's and crats and others they dont even have a pet mezz resist and team beacon warp still doesnt worked and nor has it worked the way it should since it was made. and even with they're pvp advantages they still don't stand up to an enf at lower-high lvls i mean i wouldn't care if it was even worth fighting one. also what do the nanomages from the past get? NOTHING!!! nanomage used to be called the best engineer prof and so thats what i started but now with sl and ai out you'd have to be an idiot to make a nanomage other then to get a slayerdroid out in ToTw. but now everyone is a damn solitus due to the fact that they have more hp and can self cast everything at higher lvls while it used to be that only nanomages could self cast the higher things till tl 5-6 or so. but now all these items that anyone can use have made it possible for nearly anyone any prof to self cast any nano at lvl 220. engineers are also supposed to be pistol/grenade/MA but i dont see any ma engis and all the good 1s have gone shotgun. why in god's name should engis have a shotgun? what prof uses grenade then? whats slayerdroid transference going to be used for? is there going to be in the far future not 1 engi with EP? why can't FC just do what they always do and NERF until everything is balanced? or why can't they come out with new items and perks that will do that? being the nanomage i am i admit i am a gimp and not just as being a nanomage but with alot of other things as well. and no im not saying gimme stuff or anything like that im just trying to make a point here. so FC FIX THIS GAME IM 2.5 YEARS PLAYING THIS GAME AND ITS STILL AS RETARDED AS IT WAS THAT LONG AGO!!! and dont ask me why i play it cause i got nothing better to do ^^
Reply
#19
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: timxcampbell
Original posted-at text: 2005-12-28 16:33
Auno comment ID: 21642
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

Gosh!
Reply
#20
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Earliodookie
Original posted-at text: 2006-01-02 18:06
Auno comment ID: 21882
Auno nano ID: 156285
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=156285

[hug]
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)