Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Nano] Void Inertia (55993)
#11
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Ivanth
Original posted-at text: 2008-03-02 17:58
Auno comment ID: 46078
Auno nano ID: 55993
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=55993

Use this - apf10
Reply
#12
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: AKrulz
Original posted-at text: 2008-10-27 16:17
Auno comment ID: 49975
Auno nano ID: 55993
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=55993

just go flagged near a nt kiting and he will kite flagged then;)
Reply
#13
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Ladunker586
Original posted-at text: 2009-09-21 06:38
Auno comment ID: 55059
Auno nano ID: 55993
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=55993

hehe don't get your panties in a bunch because NT's don't need a team to be effective. waaaa waaa waaa NT's cheat because they use nanos that can damage multiple targets waaa waaa waaa. Are crats cheating when they use roots, and calms that affect multiple targets as well? you are mezz experts, NTs are mass dmg experts. SHADDAP!
Reply
#14
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: buttmuffin
Original posted-at text: 2010-01-23 21:23
Auno comment ID: 56226
Auno nano ID: 55993
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=55993

never said it was cheating, said it wasnt meant to be there
FC never meant for NTs to run around with a huge ball of mobs behind them spamming aoe nukes, aoe nukes are for when there are adds on the tank
in fact, FC made the range much longer on ely hecks to help prevent kiting recently
Reply
#15
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: imsobored121
Original posted-at text: 2010-10-14 06:56
Auno comment ID: 58434
Auno nano ID: 55993
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=55993

wow that argument only took 3 years to end :p
if they wanted kiting gone they would get rid of the nanos completely, there not much use anywhere else
they just made range longer so it wasnt so damn easy. now all you gotta do is jump cast jump cast
Reply
#16
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Manicmouse
Original posted-at text: 2010-11-11 00:07
Auno comment ID: 58578
Auno nano ID: 55993
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=55993

No you! (the argument continues)
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)