+- AORebirth Forums (https://forum.ao-rebirth.com)
+-- Forum: Game Discussion (https://forum.ao-rebirth.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Forum: Items & Equipment (https://forum.ao-rebirth.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18)
+--- Thread: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) (/showthread.php?tid=1823)
Pages:
1
2
RE: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) - Auno Archive - 08-26-2026
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: mahdi007
Original posted-at text: 2007-09-21 10:45
Auno comment ID: 42340
Auno nano ID: 266288
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=266288
sad thing is it just barely brings NTs up to par with DD.. level locked.. at 219.. and with a hell of a lot more effort than "l,m"
RE: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) - Auno Archive - 08-26-2026
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: donger
Original posted-at text: 2007-10-16 13:29
Auno comment ID: 42792
Auno nano ID: 266288
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=266288
Its a pvm nuke, so it does more damage
RE: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) - Auno Archive - 08-26-2026
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Dalek
Original posted-at text: 2007-11-03 03:20
Auno comment ID: 43197
Auno nano ID: 266288
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=266288
For everyone unclear, this is a PVM only nuke, you cannot cast it on players, thats why it does more damage than Izgimmers Triple.
Sadly though it has the 'balancing' recharge time of its PVP counterpart, meaning it does less DPM than Izgimmers Ultimatum. No reason to get this nano at all.
RE: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) - Auno Archive - 08-26-2026
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Yakobo66
Original posted-at text: 2007-11-16 11:22
Auno comment ID: 43536
Auno nano ID: 266288
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=266288
they should really lower recharge to at least 3s :|
RE: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) - Auno Archive - 08-26-2026
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: vengeance636
Original posted-at text: 2008-02-29 02:41
Auno comment ID: 46020
Auno nano ID: 266288
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=266288
Agreed, the Recharge is Pathetic for a PvM nuke :\
RE: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) - Auno Archive - 08-26-2026
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Dollcet
Original posted-at text: 2008-09-19 04:31
Auno comment ID: 49298
Auno nano ID: 266288
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=266288
Well recharge is pretty bad but its faster to cast on full deff than IU
RE: [Nano] Enfraam's Surprise Assault (266288) - Auno Archive - 08-26-2026
[Historical Auno comment import]
Original author: Binarybot
Original posted-at text: 2009-02-18 02:06
Auno comment ID: 51879
Auno nano ID: 266288
Source: https://auno.org/ao/db.php?id=266288
Finally, Enfraam gets to 1-up Izzy, and the ICC slaps his hands for it.
I agree, though... since this is more for pvm, lower the recharge. 3 IU is 9 seconds, this is 8 seconds. IU is 300 more dps at min damage. Even lowering the recharge to 5 seconds would up the DPS to be only 108 less than IU. With a recharge of 5.5, it would actually outdamage IU in dps by 7 dps.